9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to your offender along with the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by law." It is actually very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents of your boy or Lady don't approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they might cut off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by legislation.
The an abundance of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is actually made obvious that police is free to acquire action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject to law. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. If your officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-area duties from the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The official court record is maintained with the court of record. Copies of case file documents usually are not accessible to the search site and will need to generally be ordered from the court of record.
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—would be the principle by which judges are bound to these types of past decisions, drawing on set up judicial authority to formulate their positions.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were advised with the boy’s past, they asked if their children were Harmless with him in their home. The therapist certain them that they'd nothing at all to worry about.
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation involves the names on the parties to the initial case, the court in which the case was read, the date it absolutely was decided, and also the book in which it is actually recorded. Different citation requirements might include things like italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It's also a effectively-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither pld case laws the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is issue to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle founded by a court, which other courts are obligated to observe.
The Cornell Law School website offers many different information on legal topics, together with citation of case law, and also offers a video tutorial on case citation.
The different roles of case legislation in civil and common law traditions create differences in just how that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale powering their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the broader legal principles.
Preceding four tax years interpreted. It's not at all from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage is just not comprehensive, but this is an excellent starting point. See Background section at base of RECAP website for more information.